Nanoscale Magnetism Control via Surface and Exchange Anisotropy for Optimized Ferrimagnetic Hysteresis.
Seung-hyun Noh, Wonjun Na, Jung-tak Jang, Jae-Hyun Lee, Eun Jung Lee, Seung Ho Moon,
Yongjun Lim, Jeon-Soo Shin, and Jinwoo Cheon
Nano Letters 12, 3716 (2012)
|
Morphological and
structural evolution of magnetic nanoparticle and correlated tunability
of nanomagnetism. (a) Magnetic NPs with various structural motifs
exhibiting differences in size, surface anisotropy, and exchange
anisotropy. (b) Magnetism tuning by the systematicchanges of magnetic
nanoparticles. Graphs i−iv correspond to the nanoparticles shown in part
a where modulation of structural motifs is needed to control parameters
such as K, Hc, Ms, or Mr. |
|
Images and magnetization behaviors of cube and sphere nanoparticles.
(a) TEM images of cube (18 nm (σ ≈ 5%) in edge length) and (b) sphere
nanoparticle (22 nm (σ ≈ 7%) in diameter). Nanoparticles have identical
composition (Zn0.4Fe2.6O4) and magnetic volume (5.8 × 10–24 m3).
(c) High resolution TEM image of cube exhibiting well-defined lattice
fringes of {100} faces. (d) M-H curves of cube and sphere measured at
300 K using SQUID. Ms of cube is 165 emu/g(Fe+Zn), and that of sphere is 145 emu/g(Fe+Zn).
Simulated magnetic spin states of (e) cube and (f) sphere by using
OOMMF program. The color map indicates the degree of spin canting
against external magnetic field (B0) where red
indicates nondeviated spins and blue indicates highly canted spins.
Local spin states on the surfaces of nanoparticles are depicted on the
right corners of parts e and f. Cube exhibits lower spin disorder rate
of 4% than sphere of 8%. |
No comments:
Post a Comment